Can a Coup Ever Be Democratic?

Events are developing quickly in Egypt but it seems that the Egyptian military is currently intervening to remove President Mohamed Morsy from power following a week of massive protests against the Muslim Brotherhood-led government.

Morsy’s national security advisor has described what’s happening as a “military coup“and by thetraditional definition of that term — “when the military or a section of the military, turns its coercive power against the apex of the state, establishes itself there, and the rest of the state takes its orders from the new regime” — this certainly seems to fit the bill. [Update: It’s official. The Army  “told President Morsi at 1700 GMT he was no longer president”. SCAF leader Abdul Fatah Khalil al-Sisi announced on television that the Constitution is being suspended and a “technocratic” government will be installed led by the chief justice of the Supreme Court.]

So how then are supporters of democracy in Egypt — both the crowds in Tahrir and foreign observers — to think about these events? Traditionally, military coups are thought of as the antithesis of the democratic process — raw political power being weilded through the barrel of a gun rather than a ballot box. In fact according to U.S. law –albeit a frequently skirted law — foreign aid cannot be provided to governments that took power in military coups. (However they respond to today’s events, don’t expect Obama administration officials to be throwing around the word “coup” this afternoon.)

But are there cases when a coup can advance democracy? In a 2012 article for the Harvard International Law JournalOzan Varol, now a professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, argues that while the vast majority of military coups are undemocratic in nature, and lead to less democratic political regimes, there are significant examples of “democratic coups d’etat.”

If the concept seems ridiculous, consider the fact that tomorrow Americans will celebrate an armed uprising to overthrow an autocratic government. Why are bloody insurgencies sometimes considered legitimate but not actions taken by established militaries acting on behalf of disenfranchised citizens?

Varol cites three case studies: the 1960 Turkish Coup in which the military overthrew the ruling Democratic Party, which had gradually consolidated political power and cracked down on political opposition and the press; the 1974 Portuguese Coup, also known as the Carnation Revolution, in which the authoritarian “Estado Novo” was overthrown by the military after tanking the country’s economy and embroiling it in a series of unpopular wars in its African colonies; and — interesting in this context — the 2011 ouster of Hosni Mubarak.

Varol argues that there are seven characteristics a coup must generally meet in order to be considered democratic:

(1) the coup is staged against an authoritarian or totalitarian regime; (2) the military responds to persistent popular opposition against that regime; (3) the authoritarian or totalitarian regime refuses to step down in response to the popular uprising; (4) the coup is staged by a military that is highly respected within the nation, ordinarily because of mandatory conscription; (5) the military stages the coup to overthrow the authoritarian or totalitarian regime; (6) the military facilitates free and fair elections within a short span of time; and (7) the coup ends with the transfer of power to democratically elected leaders


So does what’s happening in Egypt right now fit the bill? For the last two criteria, it remains to be seen. Two through five are arguably a good fit. But the first and most important one is a tough sell. Morsy was democratically elected just a year ago. To the extent that that election was marred by political interference, it was to the detriment of the Brotherhood.

On the other hand, Morsy’s opponents would probably argue that the Brotherhood was itself engaged in what’s sometimes called a self-coup or autogolpe, in which a democratically elected goverment gradually erodes the country’s political institutions in order to keep itself in power — in Morsy’s case, increasing the power of the executive through a series of presidential decrees.

The military will argue that its actions were necessary to prevent the emergence of a new authoritarian strongman. The good news is that around the world, coups now more frequently result in a quick return to the normal democratic process than in the bad old days of the Cold War, but it’s also possible Egypt may be in for something like the old-fashioned Turkish model in which the government was nominally democratic but the military would step in periodically to make “corrections”. There’s some evidence to suggest the Egyptian military has been interested in such a model since Mubarak’s ouster.

The Egyptian military’s actions over the next few weeks will largely determine how history views today’s events and the danger of admitting the existence of “democratic coups” is that coup plotters almost always describe what they’re doing as safeguarding democracy even as they accumulate power for themselves. Whether something is a “coup” or a revolution, and whether or not that coup is democratic, is generally in the eye of the beholder.

Update: Jay Ulfelder has more on why this meets the definition of a coup.


Posted on July 4, 2013, in Government, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Henry Abramson

Lectures in Jewish History and Thought. No hard questions, please.


Discover the richness and variety of the human experience

Mind Matter and News

Social Tech Life Poetry

The Life & Times of Citizen Y

The Enlightened Musings of Matthew Kummernuss

End Time Bible Prophecy

Current end time events and news leading to the return of Jesus Christ!


Breaking news and updates from News pictures, video, Twitter trends.

Political Vel Craft

Veil Of Politics

Spewing Truth in the face of Lies

Un posto a ululare alla luna, mentre portando una grande croce nera.

Political Animal Blog

"We are by nature political animals..." ~ Aristotle

Real Gun Control Now USA

This Red White & Blue Blog Supports Gun Control & Registration In The USA. The American Constitution Is A Secular Document . The Rights & Responsibilities Installed In The Constitution Are Secular & Adaptable To American Society As Needed. That is Why Women Vote, The Voting Age Is 18, And Slavery Was Outlawed By The Thirtheenth Amendment. It Is Now Time To Abolish The Second Amendment. Repeal Second Amendment, Gun Control Now, Ban High Capacity Gun Magazines, NRA Gun Myths, Guns In America, Regulate Guns, Gun Registration, Mandatory Federal Background Checks, Ban Gun Shows, NRA Policies Kill Americans, Wayne Lapierre, NRA Quotes, NRA Extremism, Support Gun Control, NRA is Propaganda, Wayne Lapierre Draft-Dodger, NRA Fact Check Fail, Pro-Gun Activists Heckle Gun Violence Victims, Gun Crime, Gun Violence, Criminal Guns, NRA Protects Criminals The NRA systematically distorts the text, history and judicial interpretation of the Second Amendment. Comments Are Moderated Accordingly.

Prepper Politics

Common Sense Politics from a Prepper's Point of View

OffSpectrum with James Farganne

Because the spectrum is only a tiny sliver of light.

Sheeple: People unable to think for themselves

Here to help educate the Sheeple before the slaughter


Just another site


Finishing Lifes Race Strong

What Did You Say?

Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions


San Diego Politics

Publius Redux

Not for the faint-of-heart or the Constitutionally-retarded (low-information Democrats and their ilk)

Right Ring

Views and News from the Right

Ramblings from the Mountian

W. V. Constitution Sect. III Art 3.22. Right to keep and bear arms. A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, and for lawful hunting and recreational use.

Wodin's Keep

Lo, There do I See the Line of my People Back to the Beginning

The Survival Place Blog

Surviving The World As We Know It

The Grey Enigma

Help is not coming. Neither is permisson. -

Lachlan + Cathy

Welcome to the House of Payne

U.S. Constitutional Free Press

Give me Liberty, Or Give me Death!

%d bloggers like this: